GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro 570

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+24.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 150% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,337 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅+24.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 150% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,337 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon Pro 570?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 24.2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2017, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017, 24.2% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $151 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 24.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 150%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 570 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $300 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	94 FPS	78 FPS
medium	83 FPS	67 FPS
high	70 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	69 FPS
medium	74 FPS	60 FPS
high	60 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	25 FPS
medium	39 FPS	24 FPS
high	27 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro 570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	136 FPS	158 FPS
medium	113 FPS	123 FPS
high	94 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	65 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	110 FPS
medium	62 FPS	82 FPS
high	44 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	56 FPS
medium	27 FPS	44 FPS
high	21 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro 570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	323 FPS	285 FPS
medium	283 FPS	228 FPS
high	205 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	214 FPS
medium	202 FPS	171 FPS
high	151 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	143 FPS
medium	117 FPS	114 FPS
high	79 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	71 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro 570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	261 FPS	153 FPS
medium	211 FPS	126 FPS
high	191 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	112 FPS
medium	158 FPS	93 FPS
high	135 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	66 FPS
medium	74 FPS	53 FPS
high	65 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	32 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro 570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro 570's 6,337 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 24.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score	7,869+24%	6,337
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896	1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	3.96 TFLOPS+33%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+51%	1105 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	112+100%
L1 Cache	896 KB+100%	448 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro 570
TDP	75W-38%	120W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+99%	52.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50.3% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 150.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).