Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro 5700

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro 5700 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon Pro 5700
8 GB 130
11,469
+45.7%
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 780
brand logoRadeon RX 5600M
brand logoRadeon 8040S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 7650 GRE
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
brand logoRadeon RX 9070

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro 5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low119 FPS
medium105 FPS
high88 FPS
ultra71 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low215 FPS
medium180 FPS
high133 FPS
ultra96 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low516 FPS
medium413 FPS
high344 FPS
ultra258 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low327 FPS
medium282 FPS
high233 FPS
ultra194 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low63 FPS
medium44 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra17 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low130 FPS
medium97 FPS
high82 FPS
ultra53 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low138 FPS
medium114 FPS
high98 FPS
ultra79 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low103 FPS
medium89 FPS
high69 FPS
ultra54 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon Pro 5700
low105 FPS
medium86 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra63 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro 5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 267.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅37.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌
    436.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
  • ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 5700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 45.7% in PassMark G3D (11,469 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $650 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 267.9% (52.8 vs 14.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro 5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 11,469 — the Radeon Pro 5700 leads by 45.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro 5700
G3D Mark Score
7,869
11,469+46%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
896
2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
6.221 TFLOPS+108%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+23%
1350 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
144+157%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro 5700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro 5700
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro 5700
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro 5700
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro 5700
TDP
75W-42%
130W
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+19%
88.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 81.4% cheaper ($650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 266.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5700 (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP
$149-81%
$799
Performance per Dollar
52.8+267%
14.4
Codename
TU117
Navi 10
Release
April 23 2019
August 4 2020
Ranking
#323
#238
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Radeon Pro 5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.