GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W6600

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6600

2021Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2903 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W6600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W6600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $500 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 129.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 20.5% longer card at 229mm vs 190mm.

Radeon PRO W6600

2021

Why buy it

  • 94.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Measures 190mm instead of 229mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 335.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W6600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 94.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 89.8% in PassMark G3D (14,932 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 129.5% (52.8 vs 23.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W6600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W6600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600

The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 14,932 — the Radeon PRO W6600 leads by 89.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2903 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W6600
G3D Mark Score
7,869
14,932+90%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
896
1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
10.4 TFLOPS+249%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2903 MHz+74%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
112+100%
L1 Cache
896 KB+75%
512 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W6600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600 carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W6600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Radeon PRO W6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W6600
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
224 GB/s+75%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W6600
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W6600
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W6600
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
190mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
149.3+42%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 77% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 129.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600 (2021 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP
$149-77%
$649
Performance per Dollar
52.8+130%
23.0
Codename
TU117
Navi 23
Release
April 23 2019
June 8 2021
Ranking
#323
#153

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.