Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7500

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7500

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon PRO W7500
8 GB 70
13,298
+69.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 5600M
brand logoRadeon 8040S
brand logoRadeon RX 5600
brand logoRadeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low136 FPS
medium119 FPS
high104 FPS
ultra85 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low339 FPS
medium284 FPS
high224 FPS
ultra174 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low598 FPS
medium479 FPS
high399 FPS
ultra299 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low522 FPS
medium453 FPS
high386 FPS
ultra299 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low190 FPS
medium176 FPS
high160 FPS
ultra139 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low87 FPS
medium69 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra40 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low146 FPS
medium123 FPS
high109 FPS
ultra92 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low120 FPS
medium105 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra80 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7500
low111 FPS
medium92 FPS
high81 FPS
ultra70 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 70.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅74.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Measures 216mm instead of 229mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌
    187.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $429 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W7500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 74.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 69% in PassMark G3D (13,298 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $280 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $429, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.4% (52.8 vs 31.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the Radeon PRO W7500 leads by 69%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1700 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score
7,869
13,298+69%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
896
1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
12.19 TFLOPS+309%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1700 MHz+2%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
112+100%
L1 Cache
896 KB+75%
512 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W7500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7500
TDP
75W
70W-7%
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
216mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
190.0+81%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 65.3% cheaper ($280 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 70.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP
$149-65%
$429
Performance per Dollar
52.8+70%
31.0
Codename
TU117
Navi 33
Release
April 23 2019
August 3 2023
Ranking
#323
#192
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.