Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7600

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7600

2023Boost: 2440 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7600 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon PRO W7600
8 GB 130
16,443
+109.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 5500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900M
brand logoRadeon RX 9070
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low129 FPS
medium112 FPS
high93 FPS
ultra64 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low172 FPS
medium143 FPS
high101 FPS
ultra75 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low740 FPS
medium592 FPS
high493 FPS
ultra370 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low244 FPS
medium210 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra139 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low86 FPS
medium64 FPS
high45 FPS
ultra31 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low68 FPS
medium52 FPS
high43 FPS
ultra25 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low133 FPS
medium110 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra78 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low124 FPS
medium107 FPS
high92 FPS
ultra75 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon PRO W7600
low112 FPS
medium93 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra66 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 92.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon PRO W7600

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅38.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌
    302% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W7600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 109% in PassMark G3D (16,443 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $450 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 92.4% (52.8 vs 27.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7600

The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 16,443 — the Radeon PRO W7600 leads by 109%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2440 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7600
G3D Mark Score
7,869
16,443+109%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
896
2048+129%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2440 MHz+47%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
128+129%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7600 carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W7600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7600. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7600.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7600
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
224 GB/s+75%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7600
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7600
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7600
TDP
75W-42%
130W
Recommended PSU
300W-54%
650W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
126.5+21%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 75.1% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 92% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7600 (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP
$149-75%
$599
Performance per Dollar
52.8+92%
27.5
Codename
TU117
Navi 33
Release
April 23 2019
August 3 2023
Ranking
#323
#123
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Radeon PRO W7600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.