GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7800

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon PRO W7800

2023Core: 1895 MHzBoost: 2525 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7800 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Radeon PRO W7800

32 GB 260

27,180

+245.4%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 385.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 260W, a 185W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅221.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
1577.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌246.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 221.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 245.4% in PassMark G3D (27,180 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 32 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and 70 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,350 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 385.6% (52.8 vs 10.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7800 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon PRO W7800

The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the Radeon PRO W7800 leads by 245.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2525 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7800
G3D Mark Score	7,869	27,180+245%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	4480+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	45.25 TFLOPS+1416%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2525 MHz+52%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	56	280+400%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2 MB+127%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 carries 32 GB. Radeon PRO W7800 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 350% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon PRO W7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7800
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	576 GB/s+350%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7800
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7800
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 110.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7800
TDP	75W-71%	260W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	2x 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	104.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 94% cheaper ($2350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 384.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7800 (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP	$149-94%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	52.8+384%	10.9
Codename	TU117	Navi 31
Release	April 23 2019	April 13 2023
Ranking	#323	#28

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.