GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 1967 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

8 GB 400

13,182

+67.5%

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1301.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 400W, a 325W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

✅129.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
2248.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌433.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 75W.
❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 129.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 67.5% in PassMark G3D (13,182 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, and 602 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,350 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1301.8% (52.8 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 13,182 — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leads by 67.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1967 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score	7,869	13,182+68%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	3840 ×2+329%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS ×2+406%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1967 MHz+18%
ROPs	32	96 ×2+200%
TMUs	56	240 ×2+329%
L1 Cache	896 KB+17%	768 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 575% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	864 GB/s+575%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 136.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP	75W-81%	400W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	280mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+218%	33.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 95.7% cheaper ($3350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1289.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP	$149-96%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	52.8+1289%	3.8
Codename	TU117	Navi 21
Release	April 23 2019	August 3 2021
Ranking	#323	#157

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.