G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+22.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 724.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7130: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,406 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
571.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅+22.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 724.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7130: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,406 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
571.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 22.8% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2016, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, 22.8% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and you are getting 22.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 724.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro WX 7130 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,000 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 7130 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	94 FPS	134 FPS
medium	83 FPS	113 FPS
high	70 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	58 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	114 FPS
medium	74 FPS	96 FPS
high	60 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	42 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	39 FPS
medium	39 FPS	36 FPS
high	27 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	136 FPS	192 FPS
medium	113 FPS	167 FPS
high	94 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	137 FPS
medium	62 FPS	111 FPS
high	44 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	74 FPS
medium	27 FPS	62 FPS
high	21 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	323 FPS	288 FPS
medium	283 FPS	231 FPS
high	205 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	216 FPS
medium	202 FPS	173 FPS
high	151 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	144 FPS
medium	117 FPS	115 FPS
high	79 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	72 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	261 FPS	248 FPS
medium	211 FPS	215 FPS
high	191 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	188 FPS
medium	158 FPS	165 FPS
high	135 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	104 FPS
medium	74 FPS	85 FPS
high	65 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro WX 7130

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 6,406 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 22.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score	7,869+23%	6,406
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.728 TFLOPS+92%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+34%	1243 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	144+157%
L1 Cache	896 KB+56%	576 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 7130
TDP	75W-42%	130W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+113%	49.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85.1% less ($851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 725% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).