Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 240

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 240 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+1310.2%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon R5 240
2 GB 30
558
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 2900 GT
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 3850
brand logoRadeon HD 7650M
brand logoRadeon HD8530M
brand logoRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low11 FPS
medium7 FPS
high4 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low25 FPS
medium14 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low25 FPS
medium20 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low25 FPS
medium20 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low25 FPS
medium20 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low6 FPS
medium3 FPS
high2 FPS
ultra2 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low5 FPS
medium4 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low25 FPS
medium17 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low25 FPS
medium20 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 240
low5 FPS
medium4 FPS
high2 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅918.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 458.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Radeon R5 240 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
  • ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 918.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1310.2% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 558), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $90 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $59, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 458.4% (52.8 vs 9.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon R5 240's 558 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1310.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 780 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 240
G3D Mark Score
7,869+1310%
558
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+180%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+566%
0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+113%
780 MHz
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
56+180%
20
L1 Cache
896 KB+1020%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 240
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 240) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 240
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_0 (Radeon R5 240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 240
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 240). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 240
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 240
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
300W
250W-17%
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
168mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
—
Perf/Watt
104.9+464%
18.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon R5 240 launched at $59. On MSRP, Radeon R5 240 was 60.4% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.5 (Radeon R5 240) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 455.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 240
MSRP
$149
$59-60%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+456%
9.5
Codename
TU117
Oland
Release
April 23 2019
October 8 2013
Ranking
#323
#911
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Radeon R5 240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.