GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 435.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 799.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 435.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1240.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 587), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 799.7% (52.8 vs 5.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 587 points. Launch price was $579.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon R5 A6-8500P's 587 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1240.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-8500P). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2105 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 A6-8500P
G3D Mark Score
7,869+1241%
587
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
896
3840+329%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
16.17 TFLOPS+442%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2105 MHz+26%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
56
240+329%
L1 Cache
896 KB+17%
768 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 A6-8500P
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-8500P. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) — the Radeon R5 A6-8500P has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 A6-8500P
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 A6-8500P's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-8500P). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 A6-8500P
TDP
75W-70%
250W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+4461%
2.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A6-8500P was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.9 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 794.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 A6-8500P (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP
$149
$100-33%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+795%
5.9
Codename
TU117
Navi 21
Release
April 23 2019
October 28 2020
Ranking
#323
#65

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.