GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 694.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1608% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Radeon R7 A10-8850 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 67.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 694.5% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 918% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 773), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1608% (52.8 vs 3.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon R7 A10-8850's 773 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 918%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R7 A10-8850
G3D Mark Score
7,869+918%
773
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+75%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+264%
0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
896 KB+600%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R7 A10-8850
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R7 A10-8850
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8850's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R7 A10-8850
TDP
75W
55W-27%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+644%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 40.4% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1603.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP
$149-40%
$250
Performance per Dollar
52.8+1603%
3.1
Codename
TU117
Cape Verde
Release
April 23 2019
July 6 2016
Ranking
#323
#667

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.