GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5300

2020Core: 1327 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
RX family
·······

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 5300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 5300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 21.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 15.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 27.2% longer card at 229mm vs 180mm.

Radeon RX 5300

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Delivers 11.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Measures 180mm instead of 229mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 7,606), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 5300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 1650 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 5300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11.6% (59.0 vs 52.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 5300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon RX 5300

The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5300
G3D Mark Score
7,869+3%
7,606
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
896
1408+57%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+55%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+1%
1645 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
88+57%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.5 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300) — a 31.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
168 GB/s+31%
Bus Width
128-bit+33%
96-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.5 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5300
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5300
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5300
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
8-pin
Length
229mm
180mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+38%
76.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5300 was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 11.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5300 (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5300
MSRP
$149
$129-13%
Performance per Dollar
52.8
59.0+12%
Codename
TU117
Navi 14
Release
April 23 2019
May 28 2020
Ranking
#323
#336

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.