GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 5500

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5500

2019Boost: 1845 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 8,837).
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 27.2% longer card at 229mm vs 180mm.

Radeon RX 5500

2019

Why buy it

  • +12.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Measures 180mm instead of 229mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 20.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $179 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • 46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 5500 better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Yes. Radeon RX 5500 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 12.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 5500 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 12.3% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is easier to justify on price alone at $149 MSRP, but Radeon RX 5500 is still the stronger gaming card overall. Radeon RX 5500 is about 20.1% more expensive on MSRP at $179 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 12.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. Go with Radeon RX 5500 if you want the better experience; go with GeForce GTX 1650 if keeping cost down matters more than squeezing out the highest performance.
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a very good gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Around $149 MSRP, it makes sense if you would rather save money than pay about 20.1% more for the extra performance. If you have more room in the budget, Radeon RX 5500 is still the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
1080p
low94 FPS106 FPS
medium83 FPS92 FPS
high70 FPS76 FPS
ultra58 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS94 FPS
medium74 FPS81 FPS
high60 FPS61 FPS
ultra50 FPS35 FPS
4K
low41 FPS32 FPS
medium39 FPS29 FPS
high27 FPS20 FPS
ultra24 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
1080p
low136 FPS113 FPS
medium113 FPS79 FPS
high94 FPS54 FPS
ultra71 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS76 FPS
medium62 FPS47 FPS
high44 FPS34 FPS
ultra35 FPS25 FPS
4K
low36 FPS36 FPS
medium27 FPS24 FPS
high21 FPS19 FPS
ultra15 FPS14 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
1080p
low323 FPS349 FPS
medium283 FPS304 FPS
high205 FPS238 FPS
ultra169 FPS198 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS285 FPS
medium202 FPS239 FPS
high151 FPS199 FPS
ultra117 FPS149 FPS
4K
low130 FPS176 FPS
medium117 FPS151 FPS
high79 FPS101 FPS
ultra50 FPS74 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
1080p
low261 FPS170 FPS
medium211 FPS140 FPS
high191 FPS124 FPS
ultra166 FPS97 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS121 FPS
medium158 FPS100 FPS
high135 FPS90 FPS
ultra113 FPS69 FPS
4K
low99 FPS69 FPS
medium74 FPS56 FPS
high65 FPS46 FPS
ultra51 FPS34 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 5500

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon RX 5500

The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 5500's 8,837 — the Radeon RX 5500 leads by 12.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1845 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
G3D Mark Score
7,869
8,837+12%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
896
1408+57%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS+74%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1845 MHz+11%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
88+57%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
224 GB/s+75%
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
TDP
75W-32%
110W
Recommended PSU
300W-33%
450W
Power Connector
None
8-pin
Length
229mm
180mm
Height
111mm
110mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+31%
80.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 16.8% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 6.9% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 5500
MSRP
$149-17%
$179
Performance per Dollar
52.8+7%
49.4
Codename
TU117
Navi 14
Release
April 23 2019
October 7 2019
Ranking
#323
#297