GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • +74.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 16.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 560 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,500 vs 7,869).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon RX 560 (móvel)?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 74.9% higher PassMark G3D performance and 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2017, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017, 74.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1650 is about 50.5% more expensive on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 74.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560 (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 4,500 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
1080p
low94 FPS37 FPS
medium83 FPS23 FPS
high70 FPS17 FPS
ultra58 FPS9 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS25 FPS
medium74 FPS15 FPS
high60 FPS8 FPS
ultra50 FPS4 FPS
4K
low41 FPS10 FPS
medium39 FPS6 FPS
high27 FPS4 FPS
ultra24 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
1080p
low136 FPS83 FPS
medium113 FPS55 FPS
high94 FPS41 FPS
ultra71 FPS24 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS40 FPS
medium62 FPS29 FPS
high44 FPS21 FPS
ultra35 FPS14 FPS
4K
low36 FPS11 FPS
medium27 FPS8 FPS
high21 FPS7 FPS
ultra15 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
1080p
low323 FPS202 FPS
medium283 FPS162 FPS
high205 FPS135 FPS
ultra169 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS152 FPS
medium202 FPS122 FPS
high151 FPS101 FPS
ultra117 FPS76 FPS
4K
low130 FPS101 FPS
medium117 FPS81 FPS
high79 FPS68 FPS
ultra50 FPS51 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
1080p
low261 FPS153 FPS
medium211 FPS118 FPS
high191 FPS95 FPS
ultra166 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS110 FPS
medium158 FPS87 FPS
high135 FPS71 FPS
ultra113 FPS56 FPS
4K
low99 FPS61 FPS
medium74 FPS47 FPS
high65 FPS36 FPS
ultra51 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 4,500 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 74.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
7,869+75%
4,500
Architecture
Turing
GCN 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896
1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+21%
2.462 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+31%
1275 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56
64+14%
L1 Cache
896 KB+250%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
TDP
75W
65W-13%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+52%
69.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 33.6% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 16% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP
$149
$99-34%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+16%
45.5
Codename
TU117
Baffin
Release
April 23 2019
January 5 2017
Ranking
#323
#478