
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+12.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,967 vs 7,869).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌13.4% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅+12.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,967 vs 7,869).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌13.4% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon RX 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 78 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 570

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 570's 6,967 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 12.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1244 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+13% | 6,967 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+34% | 1244 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 570 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 570) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 570. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 5+67% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+81% | 58.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 570 launched at $169. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 11.8% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 570) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 28.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-12% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+28% | 41.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #323 | #356 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













