GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon RX 570X
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅70.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 364.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon RX 570X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon RX 570X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌13.4% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon RX 570X
The Radeon RX 570X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,923 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 570X's 1,923 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 309.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 570X uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570X). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1244 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+309% | 1,923 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+34% | 1244 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 570X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 570X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 570X carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 570X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 570X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570X) — the Radeon RX 570X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 570X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 5+67% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 570X's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570X). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+556% | 16.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon RX 570X launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 11.8% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.4 (Radeon RX 570X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 363.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-12% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+363% | 11.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #323 | #693 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 570X
