
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 32.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 185W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 580X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌53.7% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌146.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 580X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 32.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 185W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌53.7% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌146.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon RX 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 580X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 75 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 580X

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 580X
Radeon RX 580X
The Radeon RX 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,495 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 580X's 7,495 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580X). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+5% | 7,495 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 6.175 TFLOPS+107% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+24% | 1340 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+56% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580X is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 580X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580X) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 580X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580X) — the Radeon RX 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 256 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 580X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 580X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 580X's 185W — a 84.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580X). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-59% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+159% | 40.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580X launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 34.9% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32.7 (Radeon RX 580X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 61.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-35% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+61% | 32.7 |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #323 | #337 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













