Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 6300M

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 6300M Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+22.6%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon RX 6300M
4 GB 35
6,421
0.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
brand logoRadeon HD 7970M Crossfire
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M Crossfire
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7650 GRE
brand logoRadeon RX 7700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low104 FPS
medium92 FPS
high79 FPS
ultra66 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low158 FPS
medium124 FPS
high92 FPS
ultra59 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low289 FPS
medium231 FPS
high193 FPS
ultra144 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low257 FPS
medium191 FPS
high169 FPS
ultra141 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low83 FPS
medium63 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra29 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low44 FPS
medium36 FPS
high20 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low55 FPS
medium39 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra23 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low78 FPS
medium62 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra31 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon RX 6300M
low48 FPS
medium41 FPS
high22 FPS
ultra14 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅29.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 22.6% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 6,421), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GeForce GTX 1650 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 6,421 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 22.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score
7,869+23%
6,421
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
896+17%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS+24%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2400 MHz+44%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56+17%
48
L1 Cache
896 KB+250%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s+100%
64 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit+300%
32-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
—
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
Navi 24 Media
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6300M
TDP
75W
35W-53%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
229mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
183.5+75%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 6300M
MSRP
$149
—
Codename
TU117
Navi 24
Release
April 23 2019
January 4 2022
Ranking
#323
#379
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Radeon RX 6300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.