G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+262.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Delivers 286.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 640

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 7,869).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
6.7% HIGHER MSRP
$159 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 640

2019

Why buy it

✅+262.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Delivers 286.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 7,869).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
6.7% HIGHER MSRP
$159 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon RX 640?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 2,172 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 640 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 262.3% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR 3 + AFMF, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $10 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 262.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 286.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 640 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 640 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $159 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 640 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	94 FPS	40 FPS
medium	83 FPS	26 FPS
high	70 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	28 FPS
medium	74 FPS	17 FPS
high	60 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	10 FPS
medium	39 FPS	7 FPS
high	27 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 640

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	136 FPS	77 FPS
medium	113 FPS	48 FPS
high	94 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	35 FPS
medium	62 FPS	26 FPS
high	44 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	10 FPS
medium	27 FPS	7 FPS
high	21 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 640

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	323 FPS	98 FPS
medium	283 FPS	78 FPS
high	205 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	73 FPS
medium	202 FPS	59 FPS
high	151 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	49 FPS
medium	117 FPS	39 FPS
high	79 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 640

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	261 FPS	98 FPS
medium	211 FPS	78 FPS
high	191 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	73 FPS
medium	158 FPS	59 FPS
high	135 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	49 FPS
medium	74 FPS	39 FPS
high	65 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 640

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 640

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 640

The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 640's 2,172 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 262.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
G3D Mark Score	7,869+262%	2,172
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+40%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+91%	1.559 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+37%	1218 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+460%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 640 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
DirectX	12	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	6+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 640
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+142%	43.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 6.3% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.7 (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 285.4% better value.