G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX 6700

2021

Why buy it

✅118.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅150% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
154.4% HIGHER MSRP
$379 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 6700

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅118.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅150% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
154.4% HIGHER MSRP
$379 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6700 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 6700 averages 118.8% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 18,920 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6700 is a 2021 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019, 140.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 10 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6700 is about 154.4% more expensive on MSRP at $379 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 118.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 140.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6700 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 6700 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	94 FPS	168 FPS
medium	83 FPS	150 FPS
high	70 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	140 FPS
medium	74 FPS	113 FPS
high	60 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	86 FPS
medium	39 FPS	73 FPS
high	27 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	136 FPS	432 FPS
medium	113 FPS	357 FPS
high	94 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	238 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	271 FPS
medium	62 FPS	223 FPS
high	44 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	126 FPS
medium	27 FPS	107 FPS
high	21 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	323 FPS	844 FPS
medium	283 FPS	681 FPS
high	205 FPS	568 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	426 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	639 FPS
medium	202 FPS	511 FPS
high	151 FPS	426 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	319 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	426 FPS
medium	117 FPS	341 FPS
high	79 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	213 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	261 FPS	679 FPS
medium	211 FPS	564 FPS
high	191 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	528 FPS
medium	158 FPS	440 FPS
high	135 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	313 FPS
medium	74 FPS	277 FPS
high	65 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	206 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 6700

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 6700

The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 6700's 18,920 — the Radeon RX 6700 leads by 140.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2450 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
G3D Mark Score	7,869	18,920+140%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	11.29 TFLOPS+278%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2450 MHz+47%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 offers 150% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) — a 150% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	10 GB+150%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	320 GB/s+150%
Bus Width	128-bit	160-bit+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCE
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6700
TDP	75W-57%	175W
Recommended PSU	300W-45%	550W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	108.1+3%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 60.7% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 49.9 (Radeon RX 6700) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 5.8% better value. The Radeon RX 6700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).