G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 20,096).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 69.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023

Why buy it

✅+155.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 31.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+155.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 31.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 20,096).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 69.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,096 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 155.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is about 94.0% more expensive on MSRP at $289 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 155.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $149 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	94 FPS	220 FPS
medium	83 FPS	201 FPS
high	70 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	180 FPS
medium	74 FPS	147 FPS
high	60 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	93 FPS
medium	39 FPS	78 FPS
high	27 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	136 FPS	479 FPS
medium	113 FPS	405 FPS
high	94 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	298 FPS
medium	62 FPS	246 FPS
high	44 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	173 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	131 FPS
medium	27 FPS	112 FPS
high	21 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	70 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	323 FPS	867 FPS
medium	283 FPS	705 FPS
high	205 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	452 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	663 FPS
medium	202 FPS	532 FPS
high	151 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	452 FPS
medium	117 FPS	362 FPS
high	79 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	226 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	261 FPS	768 FPS
medium	211 FPS	642 FPS
high	191 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	445 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	579 FPS
medium	158 FPS	487 FPS
high	135 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	328 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	346 FPS
medium	74 FPS	308 FPS
high	65 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	224 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB's 20,096 — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB leads by 155.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
G3D Mark Score	7,869	20,096+155%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2560+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS+343%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2581 MHz+55%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	160+186%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	12 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	384 GB/s+200%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-50%	600W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+30%	80.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB launched at $289. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 48.4% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 69.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 31.6% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).