G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 245W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7700 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX 7700 XT

2023

Why buy it

✅148.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
201.3% HIGHER MSRP
$449 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌226.7% higher power demand at 245W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 7700 XT

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 245W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅148.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7700 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
201.3% HIGHER MSRP
$449 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌226.7% higher power demand at 245W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7700 XT better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 7700 XT is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 7700 XT averages 148.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,654 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7700 XT is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7700 XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 187.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7700 XT is about 201.3% more expensive on MSRP at $449 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 148.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 187.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 7700 XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 7700 XT earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7700 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low	94 FPS	176 FPS
medium	83 FPS	155 FPS
high	70 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	119 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	147 FPS
medium	74 FPS	119 FPS
high	60 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	89 FPS
medium	39 FPS	74 FPS
high	27 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7700 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low	136 FPS	532 FPS
medium	113 FPS	452 FPS
high	94 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	298 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	367 FPS
medium	62 FPS	304 FPS
high	44 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	165 FPS
medium	27 FPS	138 FPS
high	21 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	89 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7700 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low	323 FPS	892 FPS
medium	283 FPS	723 FPS
high	205 FPS	627 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	510 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	691 FPS
medium	202 FPS	555 FPS
high	151 FPS	470 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	480 FPS
medium	117 FPS	388 FPS
high	79 FPS	319 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	255 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7700 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low	261 FPS	793 FPS
medium	211 FPS	694 FPS
high	191 FPS	624 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	510 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	626 FPS
medium	158 FPS	547 FPS
high	135 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	423 FPS
medium	74 FPS	380 FPS
high	65 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	255 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7700 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 7700 XT

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 7700 XT

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 25 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1435 MHz to 2544 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,654 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 7700 XT's 22,654 — the Radeon RX 7700 XT leads by 187.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7700 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,456 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 35.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2544 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
G3D Mark Score	7,869	22,654+188%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	3456+286%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	35.17 TFLOPS+1079%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2544 MHz+53%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	216+286%
L1 Cache	896 KB+17%	768 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 XT offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — a 237.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the Radeon RX 7700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	12 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	432 GB/s+238%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700 XT).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 7700 XT's 245W — a 106.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 700W (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 55°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7700 XT
TDP	75W-69%	245W
Recommended PSU	300W-57%	700W
Power Connector	None	2x 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	55°C-21%
Perf/Watt	104.9+13%	92.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT launched at $449. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 66.8% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 50.5 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4.6% better value. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).