
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 8050S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 16,167).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Radeon RX 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅+105.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌168.5% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅+105.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 16,167).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌168.5% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 8050S better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 8050S

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 8050S
Radeon RX 8050S
The Radeon RX 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2800 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,167 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 8050S's 16,167 — the Radeon RX 8050S leads by 105.5%. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 (Radeon RX 8050S). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 16,167+105% |
| Shading Units | 896+2700% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2800 MHz+68% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 8050S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 8050S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 8050S has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon RX 8050S) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 8050S. Bus width: 128-bit vs System Shared.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | none |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | LPDDR5X (Shared) |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 256 GB/s (Max)+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System Shared |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 8050S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon RX 8050S). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 8050S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 8050S's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon RX 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon RX 8050S). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 293.9+180% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 8050S launched at $400. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 62.7% less ($251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 40.4 (Radeon RX 8050S) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 30.7% better value. The Radeon RX 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+31% | 40.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | — |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #149 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













