G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 260mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 20,352).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 58.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

2025

Why buy it

✅+158.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 10.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
❌13.5% longer card at 260mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 260mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+158.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 10.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 20,352).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 58.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
❌13.5% longer card at 260mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,352 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a 2025 card with FSR Upscaling + Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019, 158.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is about 134.2% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 158.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 10.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $149 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
1080p
low	94 FPS	270 FPS
medium	83 FPS	255 FPS
high	70 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	180 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	247 FPS
medium	74 FPS	208 FPS
high	60 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	144 FPS
medium	39 FPS	121 FPS
high	27 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
1080p
low	136 FPS	449 FPS
medium	113 FPS	366 FPS
high	94 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	267 FPS
medium	62 FPS	220 FPS
high	44 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	128 FPS
medium	27 FPS	105 FPS
high	21 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
1080p
low	323 FPS	916 FPS
medium	283 FPS	733 FPS
high	205 FPS	611 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	458 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	687 FPS
medium	202 FPS	550 FPS
high	151 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	458 FPS
medium	117 FPS	366 FPS
high	79 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	229 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
1080p
low	261 FPS	755 FPS
medium	211 FPS	653 FPS
high	191 FPS	550 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	458 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	592 FPS
medium	158 FPS	516 FPS
high	135 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	366 FPS
medium	74 FPS	328 FPS
high	65 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	229 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 3130 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,352 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB's 20,352 — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB leads by 158.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 25.64 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 3130 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
G3D Mark Score	7,869	20,352+159%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	25.64 TFLOPS+759%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	3130 MHz+88%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	128+129%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — a 150% advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	320 GB/s+150%
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 5.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 5.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 260mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 78.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
TDP	75W-53%	160W
Recommended PSU	300W-45%	550W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	260mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-10%	78
Perf/Watt	104.9	127.2+21%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB launched at $349. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 57.3% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 58.3 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB offers 10.4% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).