
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 66.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅85.1% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 25.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅85.1% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 25.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 66.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 827 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 675 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 596 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 224 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 3130 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,883 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB's 19,883 — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB leads by 152.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 25.64 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 3130 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 19,883+153% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 25.64 TFLOPS+759% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 3130 MHz+88% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB) — a 150% advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 320 GB/s+150% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 132.6+26% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB launched at $299. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50.2% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 66.5 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB offers 25.9% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 66.5+26% |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 44 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | June 4 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #79 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













