
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $426 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 42.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 GRE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 9070 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅122.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌285.9% HIGHER MSRP$575 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 42.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($575 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
- ❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 9070 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $426 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 42.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅122.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 GRE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌285.9% HIGHER MSRP$575 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 42.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($575 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
- ❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9070 GRE better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 627 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 690 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 257 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 275 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 9070 GRE

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Radeon RX 9070 GRE
The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 8 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1420 MHz to 2790 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,418 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 24,418 — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads by 210.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,072 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 34.28 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2790 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 24,418+210% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3072+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 34.28 TFLOPS+1049% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2790 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 192+243% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — a 237.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 432 GB/s+238% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 127mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 111.0+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE launched at $575. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 74.1% less ($426 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 42.5 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 24.2% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-74% | $575 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+24% | 42.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 48 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #44 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













