
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅140.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 396.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌0.7% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.


Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,595 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H's 1,595 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 393.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H uses Vega, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+393% | 1,595 |
| Architecture | Turing | Vega |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2100 MHz+26% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 106.3+1% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.6 (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 398.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+398% | 10.6 |
| Codename | TU117 | Vega |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #545 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















