GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

+145.4%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

2 GB 132

3,206

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅12.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 476.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 132W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

2021

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
134.9% HIGHER MSRP
$350 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌76% higher power demand at 132W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 145.4% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 3,206), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 476.6% (52.8 vs 9.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,206 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U's 3,206 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 145.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2491 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
G3D Mark Score	7,869+145%	3,206
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	8.928 TFLOPS+199%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2491 MHz+50%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	112+100%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U's 132W — a 55.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
TDP	75W-43%	132W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+332%	24.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U launched at $350. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 57.4% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.2 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 473.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP	$149-57%	$350
Performance per Dollar	52.8+474%	9.2
Codename	TU117	Navi 23
Release	April 23 2019	October 13 2021
Ranking	#323	#150

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.