
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+62.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+62.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 4,852 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 62.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+62% | 4,852 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3840+329% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+442% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2105 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 240+329% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+441% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 25.5% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 117.3% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-26% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+117% | 24.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














