GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 339.3% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1650 averages 339.3% more FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 1,348 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018, 483.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 339.3% more estimated average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data and 483.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
1080p
low94 FPS32 FPS
medium83 FPS23 FPS
high70 FPS14 FPS
ultra58 FPS8 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS24 FPS
medium74 FPS15 FPS
high60 FPS7 FPS
ultra50 FPS4 FPS
4K
low41 FPS9 FPS
medium39 FPS6 FPS
high27 FPS3 FPS
ultra24 FPS2 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
1080p
low136 FPS61 FPS
medium113 FPS47 FPS
high94 FPS31 FPS
ultra71 FPS22 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS45 FPS
medium62 FPS25 FPS
high44 FPS19 FPS
ultra35 FPS14 FPS
4K
low36 FPS22 FPS
medium27 FPS14 FPS
high21 FPS11 FPS
ultra15 FPS8 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
1080p
low323 FPS61 FPS
medium283 FPS49 FPS
high205 FPS40 FPS
ultra169 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS45 FPS
medium202 FPS36 FPS
high151 FPS30 FPS
ultra117 FPS23 FPS
4K
low130 FPS30 FPS
medium117 FPS24 FPS
high79 FPS20 FPS
ultra50 FPS15 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
1080p
low261 FPS61 FPS
medium211 FPS49 FPS
high191 FPS40 FPS
ultra166 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS45 FPS
medium158 FPS36 FPS
high135 FPS30 FPS
ultra113 FPS23 FPS
4K
low99 FPS30 FPS
medium74 FPS24 FPS
high65 FPS20 FPS
ultra51 FPS15 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U's 1,348 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 483.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U uses Vega, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
G3D Mark Score
7,869+484%
1,348
Architecture
Turing
Vega
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896+133%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+128%
1.306 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+51%
1100 MHz
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
56+133%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+17%
89.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U launched at $0. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U) — the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
MSRP
$149
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
52.8
Infinity
Codename
TU117
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
April 23 2019
January 7 2018
Ranking
#323
#831