GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅3383.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12338.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 260W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌34.7% longer card at 229mm vs 170mm.

RADEON X700 PRO

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 229mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
20.1% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌246.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3383.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 10253.9% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 76), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X700 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 12338.6% (52.8 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X700 PRO has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON X700 PRO

The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 10253.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2245 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
G3D Mark Score	7,869+10254%	76
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	5120+471%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	45.98 TFLOPS+1441%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2245 MHz+35%
ROPs	32	160+400%
TMUs	56	320+471%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2.5 MB+184%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X700 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO carries 256 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
DirectX	12+33%	9_0b
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 110.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
TDP	75W-71%	260W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	170mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+34867%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 16.8% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 13100% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 PRO (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
MSRP	$149-17%	$179
Performance per Dollar	52.8+13100%	0.4
Codename	TU117	Navi 31
Release	April 23 2019	July 27 2023
Ranking	#323	#29

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RADEON X700 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.