GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON XPRESS 200M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·····

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 34113% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 23), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 34113%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score
7,869+34113%
23
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
896
2560+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
5.274 TFLOPS+77%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+62%
1030 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
160+186%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON XPRESS 200M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the RADEON XPRESS 200M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX
12+33%
9_0
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON XPRESS 200M
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
None
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
MPEG-2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 40% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON XPRESS 200M
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+20880%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON XPRESS 200M (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON XPRESS 200M
MSRP
$149
Codename
TU117
Navi 12
Release
April 23 2019
June 15 2020
Ranking
#323
#283

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.