GeForce GTX 1650 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅228.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅RadeonT RX Vega 11 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

RadeonT RX Vega 11

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 228.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 310.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 1,917), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RadeonT RX Vega 11

The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,917 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RadeonT RX Vega 11's 1,917 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 310.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 704 (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1251 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT RX Vega 11
G3D Mark Score	7,869+310%	1,917
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+27%	704
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+69%	1.761 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+33%	1251 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+27%	44

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT RX Vega 11
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the RadeonT RX Vega 11.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT RX Vega 11
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RadeonT RX Vega 11's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT RX Vega 11
TDP	75W	35W-53%
Recommended PSU	300W	1W-100%
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+91%	54.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 launched at $0. On MSRP, RadeonT RX Vega 11 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (RadeonT RX Vega 11) — the RadeonT RX Vega 11 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT RX Vega 11
MSRP	$149	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	52.8	Infinity
Codename	TU117	Raven
Release	April 23 2019	May 10 2018
Ranking	#323	#673

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RadeonT RX Vega 11 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.