G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌118.1% longer card at 229mm vs 105mm.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅133.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 229mm, a 124mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 133.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 221.1% in PassMark G3D (25,267 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 221.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	7,869	25,267+221%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	5120+471%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	15.82 TFLOPS+430%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+11%	1500 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	160+186%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	5 MB+468%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU carries 12 GB. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 237.5% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 192-bit on the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	12 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	432 GB/s+238%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TDP	75W-35%	115W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	105mm
Height	111mm	82mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	104.9	219.7+109%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	TU117	AD104
Release	April 23 2019	March 21 2023
Ranking	#323	#81

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.