GeForce GTX 1650
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,650 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1161.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅252.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌4463.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 261.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2505 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 28,454+262% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 18176+1929% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+2952% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2505 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 56 | 568+914% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 17.8 MB+1923% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 96 MB+9500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation carries 48 GB. RTX 6000 Ada Generation gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 650% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 48 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 960 GB/s+650% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 96 MB+9500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-75% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+11% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 97.8% cheaper ($6650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1157.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX 6000 Ada Generation (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-98% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+1157% | 4.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #323 | #24 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
