
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.
- ❌179.3% longer card at 229mm vs 82mm.
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅30.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 229mm, a 147mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅30.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 229mm, a 147mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.
- ❌179.3% longer card at 229mm vs 82mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A2000 Embedded GPU better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 125 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 11,117 — the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU leads by 41.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1177 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 11,117+41% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 6.026 TFLOPS+102% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+41% | 1177 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.5 MB+184% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 35W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 317.6+203% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GA107S |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #323 | #243 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













