G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $962 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
✅Delivers 201.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 140W, a 65W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

RTX A4000

2021

Why buy it

✅150.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
645.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,111 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌86.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 150.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 147.3% in PassMark G3D (19,463 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, 48 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $962 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,111, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 201.5% (52.8 vs 17.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX A4000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX A4000's 19,463 — the RTX A4000 leads by 147.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4000
G3D Mark Score	7,869	19,463+147%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	6144+586%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+542%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+7%	1560 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	192+243%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	6 MB+582%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 carries 16 GB. RTX A4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	448 GB/s+250%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4000
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4000
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 60.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4000
TDP	75W-46%	140W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	139.0+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 86.6% cheaper ($962 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 201.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000 (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4000
MSRP	$149-87%	$1111
Performance per Dollar	52.8+202%	17.5
Codename	TU117	GA104
Release	April 23 2019	April 12 2021
Ranking	#323	#85

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RTX A4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.