G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 325.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅95.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
1040.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A4500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 95.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 168.1% in PassMark G3D (21,094 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 12nm, 56 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,550 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 325.4% (52.8 vs 12.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX A4500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX A4500 leads by 168.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
G3D Mark Score	7,869	21,094+168%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	7168+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	23.65 TFLOPS+693%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1650 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	224+300%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	7 MB+695%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4500. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	448 GB/s+250%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
TDP	75W-63%	200W
Recommended PSU	300W-33%	450W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	105.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 91.2% cheaper ($1550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 325.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4500 (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX A4500
MSRP	$149-91%	$1699
Performance per Dollar	52.8+326%	12.4
Codename	TU117	GA102
Release	April 23 2019	November 23 2021
Ranking	#323	#68

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RTX A4500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.