G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 16,940).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅+115.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+115.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 16,940).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,940 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a 2025 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019, 115.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 115.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	94 FPS	143 FPS
medium	83 FPS	123 FPS
high	70 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	123 FPS
medium	74 FPS	105 FPS
high	60 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	46 FPS
medium	39 FPS	42 FPS
high	27 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	136 FPS	220 FPS
medium	113 FPS	187 FPS
high	94 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	149 FPS
medium	62 FPS	124 FPS
high	44 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	79 FPS
medium	27 FPS	65 FPS
high	21 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	323 FPS	762 FPS
medium	283 FPS	610 FPS
high	205 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	381 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	572 FPS
medium	202 FPS	457 FPS
high	151 FPS	381 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	286 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	381 FPS
medium	117 FPS	305 FPS
high	79 FPS	254 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	261 FPS	350 FPS
medium	211 FPS	302 FPS
high	191 FPS	254 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	204 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	269 FPS
medium	158 FPS	238 FPS
high	135 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	161 FPS
medium	74 FPS	136 FPS
high	65 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	88 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 16,940 — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile leads by 115.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1657 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
G3D Mark Score	7,869	16,940+115%
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	3328+271%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	11.03 TFLOPS+270%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1657 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	104+86%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	3.3 MB+275%
L2 Cache	1 MB	32 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	32 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	9th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	6th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 45W — a 50% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
TDP	75W	45W-40%
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	376.4+259%