G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 251.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌37.1% longer card at 229mm vs 167mm.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

2025

Why buy it

✅187.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 229mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
1241.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 187.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 281.5% in PassMark G3D (30,020 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 24 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 70 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,850 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 251.7% (52.8 vs 15.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1440p and 4K headroom, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition leads by 281.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1432 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
G3D Mark Score	7,869	30,020+281%
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	8960+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	25.66 TFLOPS+760%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+16%	1432 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	280+400%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	8.8 MB+900%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition carries 24 GB. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	167mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-3%	72°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	428.9+309%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 92.5% cheaper ($1850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 252% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
MSRP	$149-93%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	52.8+252%	15.0
Codename	TU117	GB203
Release	April 23 2019	August 11 2025
Ranking	#323	#17

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.