
GeForce GTX 1650

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 257.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅267.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1510.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 35,431 — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell leads by 350.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2407 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 35,431+350% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 10496+1071% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 50.53 TFLOPS+1593% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2407 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 56 | 328+486% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 10.3 MB+1070% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 64 MB+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell carries 32 GB. RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — a 700% advantage for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 32 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+700% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 64 MB+6300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 177.2+69% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 93.8% cheaper ($2250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.8 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 256.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-94% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+257% | 14.8 |
| Codename | TU117 | GB203 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #6 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















