G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 95W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅214.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌26.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 214.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 356.6% in PassMark G3D (35,929 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 24 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 82 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1440p and 4K headroom, RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,929 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile's 35,929 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile leads by 356.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 35.27 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
G3D Mark Score	7,869	35,929+357%
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	10496+1071%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	35.27 TFLOPS+1082%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1680 MHz
ROPs	32	112+250%
TMUs	56	328+486%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	10.3 MB+1070%
L2 Cache	1 MB	64 MB+6300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile carries 24 GB. RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) — a 700% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR7
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	1024 GB/s+700%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	64 MB+6300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (Blackwell) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (Blackwell). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC (Blackwell)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC (Blackwell)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile's 95W — a 23.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
TDP	75W-21%	95W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	104.9	378.2+261%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	TU117	GB203
Release	April 23 2019	March 19 2025
Ranking	#323	#106

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.