G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $8,416 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 954.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 600W, a 525W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

RTX PRO 6000

2025

Why buy it

✅296.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
5648.3% HIGHER MSRP
$8,565 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌700% higher power demand at 600W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX PRO 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 296.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 445.2% in PassMark G3D (42,899 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 48 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 188 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $8,416 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $8,565, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 954.4% (52.8 vs 5.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1440p and 4K headroom, RTX PRO 6000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX PRO 6000

The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 445.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2407 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
G3D Mark Score	7,869	42,899+445%
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	24064+2586%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	115.8 TFLOPS+3781%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2407 MHz+45%
ROPs	32	176+450%
TMUs	56	752+1243%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	23.5 MB+2570%
L2 Cache	1 MB	128 MB+12700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 carries 48 GB. RTX PRO 6000 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 650% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the RTX PRO 6000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	48 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	960 GB/s+650%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	128 MB+12700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
TDP	75W-88%	600W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	16-pin
Length	229mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+47%	71.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 98.3% cheaper ($8416 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 956% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 6000 (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
MSRP	$149-98%	$8565
Performance per Dollar	52.8+956%	5.0
Codename	TU117	GB202
Release	April 23 2019	2025
Ranking	#323	#608

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RTX PRO 6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.