G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $8,416 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 954.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 600W, a 525W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

RTX PRO 6000

2025

Why buy it

✅300.1% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
5648.3% HIGHER MSRP
$8,565 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌700% higher power demand at 600W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

RTX PRO 6000

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $8,416 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 954.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 600W, a 525W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅300.1% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
5648.3% HIGHER MSRP
$8,565 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌700% higher power demand at 600W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. RTX PRO 6000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX PRO 6000 averages 300.1% more FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 42,899 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX PRO 6000 is a 2025 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 6000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019, 445.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 48 GB instead of 4 GB, and 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX PRO 6000 is about 5648.3% more expensive on MSRP at $8,565 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 300.1% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 445.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX PRO 6000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX PRO 6000 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RTX PRO 6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
1080p
low	94 FPS	344 FPS
medium	83 FPS	328 FPS
high	70 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	218 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	328 FPS
medium	74 FPS	275 FPS
high	60 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	173 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	195 FPS
medium	39 FPS	161 FPS
high	27 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	107 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
1080p
low	136 FPS	955 FPS
medium	113 FPS	790 FPS
high	94 FPS	620 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	526 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	759 FPS
medium	62 FPS	643 FPS
high	44 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	417 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	414 FPS
medium	27 FPS	354 FPS
high	21 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	283 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
1080p
low	323 FPS	948 FPS
medium	283 FPS	775 FPS
high	205 FPS	701 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	606 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	731 FPS
medium	202 FPS	598 FPS
high	151 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	452 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	506 FPS
medium	117 FPS	419 FPS
high	79 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	316 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
1080p
low	261 FPS	999 FPS
medium	211 FPS	999 FPS
high	191 FPS	930 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	827 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	895 FPS
medium	158 FPS	786 FPS
high	135 FPS	692 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	595 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	646 FPS
medium	74 FPS	574 FPS
high	65 FPS	512 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	440 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTX PRO 6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX PRO 6000

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX PRO 6000

The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 445.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2407 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
G3D Mark Score	7,869	42,899+445%
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	24064+2586%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	115.8 TFLOPS+3781%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2407 MHz+45%
ROPs	32	176+450%
TMUs	56	752+1243%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	23.5 MB+2570%
L2 Cache	1 MB	128 MB+12700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 650% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	48 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	960 GB/s+650%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	128 MB+12700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 6000
TDP	75W-88%	600W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	16-pin
Length	229mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+47%	71.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.3% less ($8416 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 956% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).