GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025Core: 1590 MHzBoost: 2617 MHz
Similar parts
·

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 15.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $8,416 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • Delivers 16366.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 600W, a 525W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 5648.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $8,565 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 700% higher power demand at 600W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 186.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 2,747), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 188 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $8,416 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $8,565, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16366.5% (52.8 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 2,747 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 186.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2617 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
G3D Mark Score
7,869+186%
2,747
Architecture
Turing
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
896
24064+2586%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
126 TFLOPS+4123%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2617 MHz+57%
ROPs
32
192+500%
TMUs
56
752+1243%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
23.5 MB+2570%
L2 Cache
1 MB
128 MB+12700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1792 GB/s (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — a 1300% advantage for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 512-bit on the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR7
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
1792 GB/s+1300%
Bus Width
128-bit
512-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
128 MB+12700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
TDP
75W-88%
600W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
304mm
Height
111mm
137mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+2180%
4.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 98.3% cheaper ($8416 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 17500% better value. The newer card here is RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP
$149-98%
$8565
Performance per Dollar
52.8+17500%
0.3
Codename
TU117
GB202
Release
April 23 2019
March 18 2025
Ranking
#323
#609

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.