GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTXA5000-6Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+417% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8574.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

RTXA5000-6Q

2021

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,522 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
1577.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

RTXA5000-6Q

2021

Why buy it

✅+417% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8574.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,522 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
1577.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than RTXA5000-6Q?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 1,522 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while RTXA5000-6Q is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 417.0% more raw performance headroom and more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 512 MB. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $2,351 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 417.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 8574.8%. RTXA5000-6Q is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTXA5000-6Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. RTXA5000-6Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $2,500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1650. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1650 currently gives you 417.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 8574.8%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-6Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	94 FPS	68 FPS
medium	83 FPS	55 FPS
high	70 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	51 FPS
medium	74 FPS	41 FPS
high	60 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	34 FPS
medium	39 FPS	27 FPS
high	27 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTXA5000-6Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	136 FPS	68 FPS
medium	113 FPS	55 FPS
high	94 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	51 FPS
medium	62 FPS	41 FPS
high	44 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	34 FPS
medium	27 FPS	27 FPS
high	21 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTXA5000-6Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	323 FPS	68 FPS
medium	283 FPS	55 FPS
high	205 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	51 FPS
medium	202 FPS	41 FPS
high	151 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	34 FPS
medium	117 FPS	27 FPS
high	79 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTXA5000-6Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	261 FPS	68 FPS
medium	211 FPS	55 FPS
high	191 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	51 FPS
medium	158 FPS	41 FPS
high	135 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	34 FPS
medium	74 FPS	27 FPS
high	65 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RTXA5000-6Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTXA5000-6Q

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTXA5000-6Q

The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 1,522 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 417%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
G3D Mark Score	7,869+417%	1,522
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	8192+814%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+831%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1695 MHz+2%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	256+357%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	8 MB+809%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-6Q) — the RTXA5000-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-6Q
TDP	75W-67%	230W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+1489%	6.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 94% less ($2351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 8700% better value. The RTXA5000-6Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).