GeForce GTX 1650
T400
GeForce GTX 1650 vs T400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs T400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+118% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 163.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,609 vs 7,869).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌20.8% HIGHER MSRP$180 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs T400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the T400's 3,609 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 118%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the T400 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+118% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+173% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+17% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+133% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+133% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the T400.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the T400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 120.3+15% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 17.2% cheaper ($31 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 20.1 (T400) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 162.7% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-17% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+163% | 20.1 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #532 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and T400
