Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla M6

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M6

2015Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla M6 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+26.4%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Tesla M6
4 GB 100
6,225
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 760
brand logoGeForce GTX 690
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla M6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+26.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 748.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Tesla M6 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Tesla M6

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,225 vs 7,869).
  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    571.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 26.4% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 6,225), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 748.4% (52.8 vs 6.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla M6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Tesla M6

The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Tesla M6's 6,225 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 26.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M6
G3D Mark Score
7,869+26%
6,225
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
1536+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
3.625 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+41%
1180 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
96+71%
L1 Cache
896 KB+56%
576 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M6 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M6
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Tesla M6. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M6
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M6
DirectX
12
12
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M6
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M6
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
1mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
—
Perf/Watt
104.9+68%
62.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 85.1% cheaper ($851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 751.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M6
MSRP
$149-85%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
52.8+752%
6.2
Codename
TU117
GM204
Release
April 23 2019
August 30 2015
Ranking
#323
#388
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Tesla M6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.