GeForce GTX 1650
TITAN V CEO Edition
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN V CEO Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN V CEO Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN V CEO Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN V CEO Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 31 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
TITAN V CEO Edition
2018Why buy it
- ✅158.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅681.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (31 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 31 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN V CEO Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
TITAN V CEO Edition
The TITAN V CEO Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 21 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,988 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the TITAN V CEO Edition's 16,988 — the TITAN V CEO Edition leads by 115.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the TITAN V CEO Edition uses Volta, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,120 (TITAN V CEO Edition). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V CEO Edition). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN V CEO Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 16,988+116% |
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 5120+471% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 14.9 TFLOPS+399% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+14% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 56 | 320+471% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 10 MB+1036% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The TITAN V CEO Edition leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN V CEO Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V CEO Edition carries 31 GB. TITAN V CEO Edition gives you 681.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 868 GB/s (TITAN V CEO Edition) — a 578.1% advantage for the TITAN V CEO Edition. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 4096-bit on the TITAN V CEO Edition. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (TITAN V CEO Edition) — the TITAN V CEO Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN V CEO Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 31.25 GB+681% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 868 GB/s+578% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 4096-bit+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN V CEO Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 6.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V CEO Edition).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN V CEO Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the TITAN V CEO Edition's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (TITAN V CEO Edition). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN V CEO Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-50% | 600W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+54% | 68.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the TITAN V CEO Edition launched at $0. On MSRP, TITAN V CEO Edition was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (TITAN V CEO Edition) — the TITAN V CEO Edition offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN V CEO Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117 | GV100 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | June 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #323 | #115 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and TITAN V CEO Edition
