GeForce GTX 1650
TITAN Xp
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN Xp Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN Xp FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN Xp: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,050 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 237.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅TITAN Xp is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN Xp across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅108.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌704.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN Xp Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the TITAN Xp's 18,752 — the TITAN Xp leads by 138.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (TITAN Xp). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 18,752+138% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3840+329% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 12.15 TFLOPS+307% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+5% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 240+329% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.4 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The TITAN Xp leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN Xp carries 12 GB. TITAN Xp gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) — a 327.9% advantage for the TITAN Xp. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the TITAN Xp. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (TITAN Xp) — the TITAN Xp has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s+328% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (TITAN Xp). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the TITAN Xp's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (TITAN Xp). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-50% | 600W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+40% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the TITAN Xp launched at $1199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 87.6% cheaper ($1050 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 15.6 (TITAN Xp) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 238.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-88% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+238% | 15.6 |
| Codename | TU117 | GP102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | April 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #323 | #87 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and TITAN Xp
