
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- β +555.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N): it remains the more sensible modern option while UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βLimited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- β400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021β2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,200 vs 7,869).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2023-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023Why buy it
- β +555.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N): it remains the more sensible modern option while UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021β2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLimited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- β400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,200 vs 7,869).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2023-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 14 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 450 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)'s 1,200 β the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 555.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) uses Gen. 12, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 24 (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 750 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+556% | 1,200 |
| Architecture | Turing | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+3633% | 24 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+122% | 750 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)'s 15W β a 133.3% difference. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+31% | 80.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) launched at $0. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) β the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117 | Alder Lake Xe |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #914 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













